Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaziosmanpaşaspor (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gaziosmanpaşaspor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged in 2016 as possibly not notable and the Turkish article is also tagged as unsourced. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Turkey. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oops had forgotten I nominated this last month and it was closed as keep. I have added a cite as suggested but it needs more. If you guys are convinced it is notable please could you remove the notability tag and close this discussion thanks Chidgk1 (talk) 19:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - this was kept at AfD last month and so I imagine the outcome will be the same again. It would be nice if someone could locate some WP:SIGCOV, though. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, the AFD system is not for quick rematches, and the nominator has acknowledged so. Geschichte (talk) 19:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - nothing has changed since the last, very recent AFD which ended with a clear 'keep' consensus. Nomination is lazy and concerning, literally the edit directly before this re-nomination was the closure of the last AFD, so Chidgk1 has clearly not checked the article history as is required by WP:BEFORE. An explanation is required. GiantSnowman 19:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural keep – Per above. Svartner (talk) 01:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: It's been less than a month since the last AfD. No apparent WP:BEFORE. Aintabli (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.